Read PDF View Abstract
Abstract
This paper examines India’s direct and indirect approaches to conflict resolution in the present Bodoland Territorial Region of Assam. The paper reveals that the direct approach encompassing counter-insurgency military operations under the AFSPA enforcement has been effective in curbing immediate militant threats but failed to address root causes, perpetuating violence and raising human rights concerns. Conversely, an indirect approach has been adopted, which serves as a more holistic means of ensuring peace and stability. To address the root causes of conflict, governments have initiated three peace accords following the first BAC in 1993, the second BTC in 2003, and the third BTR in 2020. This third accord fosters inclusivity and cultural pride via festivals and youth programs, often seen as a mechanism for peace-building in the region. However, a question that remains unanswered is whether the existing approaches to conflict resolution will, in reality, ensure sustainable peace and security in the region.