Abstract
It is important to underline how the Constitution acknowledged designated
tribes (ST) in India and the ST status standards to address the desire for ST
status and opposition. The Indian Constitution recognizes tribal people as
Scheduled Tribes (ST) and underlines the need to preserve and support them
due to their social, educational, and economic disadvantages. However, the Indian
President can issue ST-inclusive and exclusive orders. The Ministry of Tribal
Affairs or the Indian Government sets the criteria. Primitive qualities, unique
culture, geographical remoteness, “shyness of connect†with the community, and
“backwardness†are the prerequisites. Based on these criteria, Tribals who are
allocated 31 percent reservation opposed Meiteis ST Status claim since they
are recognized as the general category but catching up in education, politics,
socialization, and economic advancement. The remaining Meiteis are classified
as Other Backward Classes (OBC), Scheduled Castes (SC), and Economically
Weaker Section (EWS) with 17 percent, 2 percent, and 10 percent reservations,
respectively. The Meiteis are demanding ST status based on the following grounds and claims: qualified for ST status, required for Constitutional protection, not
about reservation but land, culture and language preservation, community size
and religion is not the case and allegation by few Meitei leaders’ views. However,
the Tribals opposed the Meiteis’ demand for ST status for the following
reasons and perspectives: cultural, State Assembly seats and power, category
and reservation, in general, population, Meitei views, and diverse organization
perspectives. Thus, the study will briefly analyze why Meitei people have sought
ST recognition since 2011, despite being classed as “General category, SC, OBC
and EWS,†and why tribals fiercely opposed it.
Key Words: Scheduled Tribes, Meitei, Demand, Tribals, Opposed